A library of 60+ marketing agents built, tested, and deployed inside real client stacks. Research, briefing, reporting, competitive intel. Automation that does the work, rather than automation that looks good in a sales call.
Every marketing team has been pitched AI tools. Most have tried a few. Few have an actual operating stack of AI doing meaningful daily work.
The gap isn't the tools. It's the operator. Companies are being sold AI; what they need is someone who knows which work is worth automating, builds the agents properly, and maintains them when they drift. That's what this service is.
Three things. If a tool only has one or two of them, it's a prompt, a workflow, or a dashboard — not an agent.
On a schedule, a trigger, or an event. Not because a human clicked a button. Monday morning, a new competitor page ships, a new search query trends — the agent runs itself.
A report, a brief, a flagged alert, an update in your CRM. Every agent has a clear "this is what it produces and who reads it" answer. If it can't be named, it can't be built.
Notion, Slack, Google Drive, your CRM, your analytics. Agents that produce output into a silo get ignored. Agents that appear where your team already works get used.
Built for specific marketing jobs. Most engagements use three to six agents — enough to cover the biggest time-sinks without creating a stack nobody maintains. Full catalogue on request.
Most engagements take four to six weeks from the first call to the first running agent. No six-month "discovery" phase.
We look at your actual workflows, identify the biggest time-sinks, and pick the 3–6 agents to start with.
I build the agents, wire them into your stack, and test against your real data.
Agents go live. Your team is trained on what each one produces and where the output lives.
Monthly review. Agents that stop earning their keep get retired. New ones added as needs shift.
Setup fee covers the build; monthly fee covers ongoing operation, monitoring, and maintenance. Typical engagement runs three to six agents. Cancel any agent quarterly.
Scoping, build, integration into your stack, and testing against your data.
Keeps the agent running, monitored, and updated as your stack or priorities shift.
Enough coverage for the biggest time-sinks, without creating a stack nobody maintains.
The things prospects ask on the first call, answered in advance so you don't have to.
You can. The question is whether your marketing team will. Most of the companies who hire me have already tried — a few people built a few prompts, it worked for a week, then nobody maintained it and the habit died. Agents are a discipline problem, not a tools problem.
The value I add is that the agents stay alive because someone outside the team owns their uptime.
No. The agents are built on standard tooling (n8n, Zapier, custom scripts where needed) and plug into SaaS your team already uses. The only thing I need from your side is credential access to your analytics, CMS, and wherever the agents need to read or write.
I'm monitoring all running agents. If something breaks, I fix it — that's part of the monthly operating fee, not billed separately. For genuinely new failure modes I'll flag to you before changes, but the day-to-day uptime is my problem, not yours.
Kill it. Every quarter, we look at each running agent and ask: "if we switched this off, would anyone notice within two weeks?" If the answer is no, it gets retired. Paying for dead automation is worse than not automating at all.
No, and anyone selling them as team replacements is lying to you. Agents replace specific repetitive tasks — research, reporting, monitoring, first-draft generation. Your team gets hours back and spends them on strategy, editing, and judgement. Which is the work you want them on anyway.
Yes, and many clients do. Several of the library agents are effectively building blocks for the Content Engine — brief generation, competitor tracking, content refresh scoring. If you're running both services, there's no duplication; the agents are already part of how the engine works.
One conversation. No pitch deck. By the end of it, we'll both know whether this is worth building on.